Home Patient Resources Bariatric News
Health Insurers Often Balk at Weight Loss Surgery Print E-mail
News
09:20 AM CST on Thursday, February 18, 2010
By JASON ROBERSON / The Dallas Morning News This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

North Texas is a hotbed for weight-loss surgeries, yet many candidates for the procedure complain it's still too difficult to get health insurers to pay.

By one doctor's informal calculations, Dallas is the country's No. 1 market for weight-loss surgeries. It's nearly impossible to sit through a 30-minute midday TV program or sift through a newspaper without being pitched an opportunity to transform your body. Industry observers say the market here is supported by a high concentration of bariatric surgeons and one of the nation's worst rates of obesity-related diseases.

Texas ranks in the top quarter of the country for percentage of residents with Type 2 diabetes, one of the most common and deadly obesity-related diseases, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Within the state, Dallas fares worse than other big cities. Diabetes patients see Dallas doctors nearly twice as often as they do in Houston, according to a study by Pennsylvania researcher SDI Health LLC.

Some, like Terry Johnson, 45, of Burleson, say they are denied coverage for surgery because of unfair prerequisites or an outright unwillingness to pay. He wants weight-loss surgery because obesity has made him sickly.

Johnson – 260 pounds, 5 feet 11 inches tall, with diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure – said he has not been able to get the surgery because his health insurer repeatedly denied his requests and he can't afford to pay for it himself.

Johnson's weight has kept him from a good night's sleep, even with a prescribed breathing machine. That has made him prone to sinus infections, colds, bronchitis and voice loss. At night, his wife stays on guard to shake him in case he stops breathing – again.

"She says it sounds like a big freight train," Johnson said.

His doctor, Dr. Nick Nicholson, has grown frustrated with denials for coverage. Nicholson owns the Nicholson Clinic in Plano and is medical director of weight-loss surgery programs at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas.

He calculated that Dallas ranks No.1 in bariatric surgeries, based on data he has received from national suppliers of weight-loss surgical tools.

"But for every 100 people that come in, less than half will get the surgery," Nicholson said.

Some policies require patients to prove they've tried dieting, exercise, medication and psychotherapy, but many of those policies do not pay for the prerequisites, Nicholson said. In addition, submitting the correct paperwork to prove requirements are met can take months or longer if it's lost in the shuffle, Nicholson said.

A quarter of patients considering bariatric surgery are denied insurance coverage three times before getting approval, and about 60 percent report their health worsened during this waiting period, according to an online Harris Interactive survey conducted in May 2008 of 280 surgeons and 400 weight-loss surgery patients. (The American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, which has a financial interest in doing more surgeries, funded the survey.)

Documentation

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, the state's largest health insurer, requires a body mass index of 40 or more. It will OK a surgery with a BMI of 35 as long as the patient has two of the following: hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, sleep apnea, osteoarthritis or dyslipidemia, a blood condition.

In addition, it requires documentation that the patient has stopped growing taller and has completed an evaluation from a licensed counselor, psychologist or psychiatrist within 12 months.

"Practically speaking, we'd prefer to intervene well before a member reaches the point where bariatric surgery is an option," said Dr. Eduardo Sanchez, vice president and chief medical officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas.

"At that point, a lot of ground has already been lost, and no matter which treatment is chosen, the person will have experienced preventable disease and distress, and it will be very expensive to treat the patient."

Obesity costs the nation more than $75 billion a year and Texas more than $5 billion a year, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which looked at direct medical costs linked to obesity.

Patients and surgeons, however, argue that the cost of surgery – in Johnson's case, $12,000 – more than justifies the long-term cost of rebandaging obesity-related ailments.

"They know I've been to the doctor for all these other illnesses," said Johnson, who would like to get down to 180 pounds. "They have to know, because they're paying the bill."

Employers' Option

To be sure, insurers may not be to blame if they offer weight-loss surgery but the employer rejects the coverage option for workers. Most large employers in Dallas are self-insured and typically use an insurance carrier as an administrator.

The time it takes for payback also may discourage insurers from approving surgeries, Nicholson said.

"Insurance companies save money on weight-loss surgery but don't want to pay for it because the average member retention rate is lower than the time it takes to save money," Nicholson said.

If an employee receives the surgery and soon afterward finds a new job, the insurer misses out on the employee's better health and lower medical claims.

That logic, however, is debatable. A study in the September issue of The American Journal of Managed Care said insurers recover their costs for bariatric surgery in two to four years, depending on the type of surgery performed.

Across the board, insurers are routinely updating their guidelines and approving more weight-loss surgeries as the procdures become safer.

Aetna Inc. has approved 40 percent more weight-loss surgeries every year – 4,200 in 2006, 6,000 in 2007 and 8,500 in 2008. Numbers for 2009 have not been calculated but are expected to also be up 40 percent, said Aetna spokeswoman Anjie Coplin.

John Baker, president of the American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, said insurers have eased their prerequisites to surgery. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas used to require six months of medical supervision before approving the surgery but has changed it to three months, Baker said.

"I applaud them for making the treatment decisions they have been making," Baker said. Baker said the next step is to get insurers to pay for follow-up care. He said he has a dietitian in his office as a benefit to patients because many insurers won't cover them.

 
Gastric Banding Surgery Can Effectively Treat Obesity in Teens: Study Print E-mail
News

Washington, Feb 9 (ANI): A new study has shown that laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding surgery can effectively treat obesity in adolescents and seems to offer a better alternative than gastric bypass surgery.

However, further study is needed to determine whether it's better than nonsurgical options, says a UT Southwestern Medical Center surgeon.

While gastric bypass surgery permanently alters the stomach, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding surgery can be reversed and has fewer complications, making it a better fit for the still-growing adolescent population, noted Dr. Edward Livingston, chief of GI/endocrine surgery at UT Southwestern.

The findings are based on a study conducted by Australian researchers, who compared gastric banding surgery to medically supervised diets among 50 randomly assigned obese adolescents.

The Australian data showed greater weight loss among patients receiving the bands, but complication rates raised questions about whether it was worth the benefit, Dr. Livingston said.

In addition, the researchers found that while medical interventions successfully controlled many of the problematic disease complications without surgery, improvements were greater with surgery, he said.

The study appears in the Feb. 10 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. (ANI)

 
More Specialty Equipment Being Purchased to Handle Plus-Size Patients. Print E-mail
News
The Washington Post (2/8, Flaherty), reported, "Across the Washington region and the country," emergency medical service providers "have been adapting steadily to plus-size patients" by adding "specialty equipment and training to reduce their back injuries and avoid the spectacle of moving a person on planks, tarps or the floor of an ambulance." Although some communities "charge nearly double to transport patients over 350 pounds," the DC area has yet to implement such fees. "But area departments are part of a buying trend expected to double sales of specialty equipment by 2012."
 
Bariatric Surgery Safer than Living With Obesity Print E-mail
News

ANI Posted: Jan 30, 2010 | Washington

Despite risks, undergoing weight loss surgery would be safer than living with obesity, say researchers. According to Christopher Still, D.O., director of the Geisinger Centre for Nutrition and Weight Management, the risk associated with bariatric weight-loss surgery pale in comparison to the health complications that can be caused by obesity.

Bariatric surgery can help obese individuals significantly reduce their body weight and can improve a patient’s overall health. “Some obesity-related conditions can be fatal, and others require chronic medication and treatment,” said Still. “With the help of bariatric surgery, medical complications caused by obesity can be eliminated, and patients can enjoy a much healthier life,” he added. In addition to eliminating medical complications, bariatric surgery can help patients feel more in control of their lives.

Many patients can perform daily tasks they were unable to accomplish before their weight loss, including driving, walking, exercising and yard work. Many times, bariatric surgery prompts patients to develop new, healthier habits. “The benefits of bariatric surgery are much greater than simply losing a few pounds,” said Still. “After surgery, patients are able to reclaim their health and their lives,” Still added.

 
Hospital in England Turns Away Obese Expectant Mothers Print E-mail
News

ISSUE: DECEMBER, 2009  |  VOLUME: 03:04

A hospital in England will turn away mothers-to-be who have a body mass index (BMI) higher than 34 kg/m2, forcing these women to travel 20 miles to the nearest facility with a maternity unit capable of handling their care.

A spokesman for Weston General Hospital, located in Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, said it was not equipped to handle complicated births, according to a report from theTelegraph, an online news service in England (telegraph.co.uk). The expectant mothers would be cared for at a facility in Bristol, 20 miles away.

“Our foremost concern is for the safety of mothers who deliver here and their babies,” the Telegraph reported the spokesman as saying. “Mothers with a high BMI are at increased risk in labor for bleeding, needing an instrumental delivery or complications, such as the baby’s shoulder becoming trapped behind the pubic bone.”

The ruling by directors at Weston General has led some to claim that larger women are being unfairly treated.

“Women who live in the town, no matter what their size, should be able to give birth without traveling miles and miles,” said Carole Welch, who runs a weight-loss program in England. The Telegraph quoted Ms. Welch as saying, “Surely the hospital should upgrade its facilities to take in every pregnant woman? If I was over 34 BMI, I would not be happy about [the hospital’s decision], it just doesn’t seem fair.”

A report by the NHS North Somerset Primary Care Trust found the number of overweight and obese people in the county has spiraled over the past few years. It is estimated that 29,600 adults, 18% of the population, were obese, and warned that 6,000 more would be dangerously overweight by 2013.


Based on a report from the Telegraph (www.telegraph.co.uk)

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 6

Search Site

Web Design NJ by MyMediArts
Copyright © 2006 - | Advanced Laparoscopic Surgeons
HomeSurgical OptionsSeminar RegistrationTerms of ServiceSite MapContact Us

83 Hanover Road, Suite 190, Florham Park, NJ 07932